According
to Peter Greenwood in Changing Lives:
Delinquency Prevention as Crime Control Policy, evidence-based practice
involves the use of scientific principles and research to determine the
evidence of program effectiveness and to develop a set of principles for the best
program success. In delinquency prevention, this process includes many
important components that need to be assessed. Including assessment of
community and individual’s needs, the selection of successful programs, the
development and evolving of programs, and the placement of at risk youth to
particular programs, (2006).
Evidence-based practice can also
assess a community. This involves determining strength and needs of the
population, and of the programs that are in place in that community. The focus
on how evidence-based practice can be implemented into these communities is an
important subject because if the community does not approve of the practices
then it will not be successful in that community.
In
an article by Peter Greenwood and Brandon Welsh, Promoting Evidence-Based Practice in Delinquency Prevention at State
Level, it is expressed that although there are many positives to
implementing Evidence-based practices there are also obstacles that are
creating a delay in the enforcement of these successful practices, (2012). One
of the obstacles that Greenwood and Welsh bring up is the funding stream on
state levels. This is an obvious problem at the state level when it comes to
the changing of policy. This is such a hardship because there are programs that
have gained the support of the political and local communities. They have been
supporting them and they do not want to stop the funding because they believe
that they are working, when in fact they are not. An example of a non-successful
program would be ones such as “Scared Straight.” If the funding were to go to
the evidence-based practices they would see a much bigger success rate in
juvenile delinquency prevention.
Evidence-based
practices are highly involved and complex. This can create another problem when
trying to implement the programs into already developed in institutions. “Some
communities get steered away from adopting some of the more complex models
because the trainers of these models do not believe there is sufficient support
or understanding of the tasks involved among key stakeholders,” (Greenwood and
Welsh, 2012). It is obvious that this can be a dilemma because the if the
training for these practices are not sufficient then the desired outcome will
not be the same. Therefore it is extremely important to have capable
facilitators to develop these institutions. This is what the authors are
suggesting when they say that the models must have sufficient support. Though
complex, the evidence-based practices will produce successful outcomes.
In
another article by Greenwood, Preventing and Reducing Youth
Crime and Violence: Using Evidence-Based Practices, he explains how
different jurisdictions who have put funding into the proven practices were not
fully prepared for the challenges that the implementation of evidence-based
practices would bring. However, now receiving the help at state level and
developers of the programs, they have a better understanding of what it takes
to make the program successful (2010). He also mentions that over time the
program facilitators have become much better at coaching communities through
the implementation process, in turn making the programs more successfully ran. Although
the Evidenced based programming may be challenging and have obstacles that need
to be worked around, with the correct funding, program developers and state
level support the programs will continue to be successful, eventually
eliminating unsuccessful programs.
The
hope for these evidence-based practices is to receive and for state funding to
become more available and to use these practices more frequently in delinquency
prevention. Even more importantly, for the programs to be accepted into communities
and for them to become successful. In the near future, these programs will continue to become
more successful and will eventually eliminate the programs that are not
successful.
References
Greenwood, Peter W.
2006. Changing Lives: Delinquency
Prevention as Crime-
Control Policy. Chicago ,IL : University of Chicago Press.
Greenwood, Peter W. 2010. Preventing
and Reducing Youth Crime and Violence:
Using
Evidence-Based Practices.
Sacramento , CA : Governor's Office of Gang
and
Youth Violence Policy.
Greenwood, Peter W. 2012. Promoting Evidence-Based Practice in Delinquency
Prevention
at State Level. Criminology & Public Policy. Vol. 11. Issue 3.
No comments:
Post a Comment